Our PROMISE: Our ads will never cover up content.
Our children thank you.
Denise Robitaille
Published: Tuesday, August 9, 2005 - 22:00 Many quality professionals have had extensive training as internal auditors. Most auditing courses include a module on interviewing. Depending on how rigorous the course is, this particular module can consume several hours. The Quality Audit Handbook (ASQ, 1999) and the CQA Primer (Quality Council of Indiana, 1992) contain several pages devoted to interviewing techniques. Since this is one of the basic activities in auditing, we quality professionals get a lot of practice. Unfortunately, it rarely occurs to us that others haven’t had the benefit of the same training and practical experience, when we send them out to ask questions that we now take for granted. If you want to increase the pool of individuals who can meaningfully contribute to your corrective action process, you need to ensure that they have the proper tools. That includes mentoring them in developing their own interviewing skills. This should consist of coaching on content and context: what you ask and how you ask it. What follows is a short list of tips to guide problem solvers through their first experiences in interviewing. Once the interview has started: Interviewing, as part of an investigation or root cause analysis, carries the same basic rules of common courtesy and accompanying code of conduct as it does in auditing. I sum it all up with an (embarrassingly maternal) admonition: Be nice. This may seem a bit simplistic, but these are the very same tips that auditors get with their training, which is appropriate since the purpose in both cases is the same: to get objective evidence to determine the conformance of an activity to defined requirements. And the goal in both cases is to improve the way you do business. Quality Digest does not charge readers for its content. We believe that industry news is important for you to do your job, and Quality Digest supports businesses of all types. However, someone has to pay for this content. And that’s where advertising comes in. Most people consider ads a nuisance, but they do serve a useful function besides allowing media companies to stay afloat. They keep you aware of new products and services relevant to your industry. All ads in Quality Digest apply directly to products and services that most of our readers need. You won’t see automobile or health supplement ads. So please consider turning off your ad blocker for our site. Thanks, Denise Robitaille is the author of thirteen books, including: ISO 9001:2015 Handbook for Small and Medium-Sized Businesses. She is chair of PC302, the project committee responsible for the revision to ISO 19011, an active member of USTAG to ISO/TC 176 and technical expert on the working group that developed the current version of ISO 9004:2018. She has participated internationally in standards development for over 15 years. She is a globally recognized speaker and trainer. Denise is a Fellow of the American Society for Quality and an Exemplar Global certified lead assessor and an ASQ certified quality auditor. As principal of Robitaille Associates, she has helped many companies achieve ISO 9001 registration and to improve their quality management systems. She has conducted training courses for thousands of individuals on such topics as auditing, corrective action, document control, root cause analysis, and implementing ISO 9001. Among Denise’s books are: 9 Keys to Successful Audits, The (Almost) Painless ISO 9001:2015 Transition and The Corrective Action Handbook. She is a frequent contributor to several quality periodicals.The Art of Interviewing
Learn to effectively pose a question to elicit pertinent information.
I’ve long been a proponent of involving as many individuals as possible in corrective action, both during the root cause analysis phase and during the development of the action plan. Middle managers, supervisors, machine operators, customer service representatives, shippers, software test engineers, buyers, etc., should all be invited at one time or another to participate in this process. Each possesses distinctive talents, a unique perspective on situations and special knowledge relating to his or her area of expertise. As such, they collectively represent an often-untapped trove of ideas and information.One of the drawbacks to including these individuals in the corrective action process is that many of them lack adequate interviewing skills. They don’t know how to effectively pose a question to elicit pertinent information. Some, not fully comprehending the purpose of fact-finding and root cause analysis, are worried about getting their co-workers in trouble by “fingering” the individual who’s to blame for the problem. Others are simply intimidated by the whole process. Another downside is that individuals who aren’t skilled at interviewing often have inefficient practices that waste company time.
Our PROMISE: Quality Digest only displays static ads that never overlay or cover up content. They never get in your way. They are there for you to read, or not.
Quality Digest Discuss
About The Author
Denise Robitaille
© 2023 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute, Inc.