Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Management Features
Gleb Tsipursky
Belief that innovation is geographically bound to office spaces is challenged by empirical evidence
Andy J. Yap
When organizations merge, people must come together
Gene Russell
Resources to help increase your financial literacy
Michael King
Augmenting and empowering life-science professionals
Meg Sinclair
100% real, 100% anonymized, 100% scary

More Features

Management News
For companies using TLS 1.3 while performing required audits on incoming internet traffic
Accelerates service and drives manufacturing profitability
New video in the NIST ‘Heroes’ series
A tool to help detect sinister email
Developing tools to measure and improve trustworthiness
Manufacturers embrace quality management to improve operations, minimize risk
How well are women supported after landing technical positions?

More News

Dawn Bailey


NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 Expands Scope

Adds increased focus on governance

Published: Tuesday, October 17, 2023 - 11:00

(NIST: Gaithersburg, MD) -- Since 2014, the NIST Cybersecurity Framework has been used by organizations to reduce cybersecurity risks. In 2016 (with a revision in 2019), the Baldrige Performance Excellence Program published a companion self-improvement tool, Baldrige Cybersecurity Excellence Builder (BCEB), to help organizations better understand the effectiveness of their cybersecurity risk management efforts and identify improvement opportunities in the context of their overall organizational performance.

The self-assessment tool blended organizational assessment approaches from the Baldrige Program with the concepts and principles of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework.

Baldrige Cybersecurity Excellence Builder

One of the most common questions we receive regarding the BCEB is how it works with the NIST Cybersecurity Framework. While more information can be found online, here is the short answer (from the blog, “How Does Baldrige Cyber Work With the NIST Cybersecurity Framework?”).

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework assembles and organizes standards, guidelines, and practices that are working effectively in many organizations. It also includes informative references that are common across critical infrastructure sectors. You’re encouraged to customize these based on business drivers to maximize their value to your organization. The BCEB helps with this customization by asking about your organizational characteristics and environment. The BCEB also helps you understand the effectiveness and efficiency of your cybersecurity approaches, as well as the quality of your cybersecurity-related results.

Notably, the BCEB helps an organization determine whether it’s obtaining effective and efficient results from cybersecurity initiatives, including those enacted based on the NIST Cybersecurity Framework outcomes.

Draft of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

After reviewing more than a year’s worth of community feedback, NIST has recently released a draft of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 (CSF 2.0), noting that there was widespread agreement that changes were warranted to address current and future cybersecurity challenges and to make it easier for organizations to use the framework. The update is intended to ensure that organizations can take steps to address those challenges and apply the Cybersecurity Framework to all types of technology environments, including cloud, mobile, and artificial intelligence systems. It also provides new guidance on how to use the Cybersecurity Framework in coordination with other frameworks, such as the Privacy Framework and Enterprise Risk Management guidance, to address technology risks broadly.

According to NIST, the draft CSF 2.0 reflects several major changes:
• An expanded scope to provide cybersecurity protection for organizations of all sizes and across all industries
• The addition of a “Govern” function to the pillars of a successful and holistic cybersecurity program. “Govern” represents the sixth function, along with “Identify,” “Protect,” “Detect,” “Respond,” and “Recover.” (Note: Governance is a key area in the Baldrige Excellence Framework. For example, item 1.2, Governance and Societal Contributions, asks how an organization ensures responsible governance and how a governance system reviews and achieves accountability for senior leaders’ actions, fiscal accountability, and succession planning, among other considerations.)
• Additional guidance on implementing CSF 2.0, including how to create profiles based on the framework

NIST is accepting public comments on the draft until Nov. 4, 2023. Specifically, NIST is seeking feedback on whether the draft addresses organizations’ current and anticipated future cybersecurity challenges, is aligned with leading practices and guidance resources, and reflects comments received so far.


NIST expects the final version of CSF 2.0 to be published in early 2024. The Baldrige Program intends to update the BCEB accordingly and release BCEB 2.0 in 2024 as well. The Baldrige Program encourages organizations to explore using the NIST Cybersecurity Framework and BCEB together to understand the effectiveness of their cybersecurity risk management efforts.

Baldrige Cybersecurity Excellence Builder

The Baldrige Cybersecurity Excellence Builder, v. 1.1, is a self-assessment tool to help organizations better understand the effectiveness of their cybersecurity risk-management efforts and identify improvement opportunities in the context of their overall organizational performance. You can download your copy here.

Published Sept. 19, 2023, on the NIST Blogrige.


About The Author

Dawn Bailey’s picture

Dawn Bailey

Dawn Bailey is a writer/editor for the Baldrige Program involved in all aspects of communications, from leading the Baldrige Executive Fellows program to managing the direction of case studies, social media efforts, and assessment teams. She has more than 25 years of experience (18 years at the Baldrige Program) working on publications and education teams. Her background is in English and journalism, with degrees from the University of Connecticut and an advanced degree from George Mason University.