Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Management Features
Constance Noonan Hadley
The time has come to check whether the benefits of teamwork still outweigh the costs
Naresh Pandit
Enter the custom recovery plan
Anton Ovchinnikov
In competitive environments, operational innovation could well be the answer to inventory risk
Julie Winkle Giulioni
The old playbook probably won't work
Sarah Schiffling
But supply chains will get worse before they get better

More Features

Management News
Program inspires leaders to consider systems perspective for continuous improvement and innovation
Recent research finds organizations unprepared to manage more complex workforce
Attendees will learn how three top manufacturing companies use quality data to predict and prevent problems, improve efficiency, and reduce costs
More than 40% of directors surveyed cite the ability of companies to execute as one of the biggest threats to improving ESG performance
MIT Sloan study shows that target-independent compensation systems can be superior
Steps that will help you improve and enhance your employee recruitment, retention, and engagement
300 Talent acquisition leaders and HR executives from companies gather in Kansas City
FedEx demonstrates commitment to customer-focused continuous improvement

More News

Management

Sales Numbers Are Up? It May Only Be Inflation.

Better internal information systems help managers tell consumer demand from inflationary pressure

Published: Tuesday, May 17, 2022 - 12:02

In early 2021, people had already started commenting that inflation might be coming back. But few people could predict just how high it would go. In January 2022, year-on-year inflation in the OECD area rose to 7.2 percent. Consumer price inflation in the United States hit a 40-year high of 7.5 percent that same month. The ongoing war in Ukraine is now adding to these inflationary pressures.

This raises the question: How do managers deal with such macroeconomic shocks? As professors of economics and accounting, we’re naturally interested in examining how managers decipher macroeconomic signals. Are they able to understand the drivers of these signals and split them up into relevant components? And what can firms do to help their managers make the best decisions?

In a new working paper, we start by establishing a baseline fact: When there’s an inflation shock, firms as a whole react by increasing investments. By investments, we mean traditional capital investments or capital expenditures, e.g., machines, plants, and trucks that appear on the balance sheet.

In other words, when the inflation rate goes up—basically a number that reflects nominal information—firms react by increasing real, actual investments.

Nominal isn’t a synonym for real

This goes against economics theory that says nominal variables should not affect real variables. But in practice, due to imperfect information, managers often struggle to interpret and react correctly to macroeconomic signals.

When managers observe that sales numbers are up, they need to remember that it could be for two reasons, broadly speaking. The boost in sales revenues could be because consumers love their products or services. It could also simply be that prices have gone up in general.

If the higher sales numbers are based on real consumer demand, managers are then right to propose investments to ensure their firm can continue catering to demand. However, if the cause is inflation, the opposite holds. Aside from creating uncertainty, inflation could lead to a drop, not an increase, in real demand. Investments shouldn’t follow automatically in this case—except we find that they do.

Managers need proper information systems

We then figuratively looked under the hood to see which firms were better at filtering real, firm-level data from aggregate-level, nominal data. To do this, we relied on data from the World Management Survey, a project developed to measure various management practices, thereby allowing researchers to identify the effect of those practices on corporate outcomes.

Our sample includes more than 3,500 medium-sized firms from 21 countries that participated in the survey from 2004 to 2015. The United Kingdom, Italy, Greece, and China provided about half of the contributions.

Specifically, we looked at a subset of the survey questions that measures how organizations monitor what goes on inside the firm, and how this information is used by managers for decision-making. These include open-ended questions related to how well the firm documents’ information flows. How good is the tracking? How much dialogue is there about the information?

We found that when the quality of the internal information system is higher, the relation between inflation shocks and investments is reduced, as it should be.

In other words, the higher the quality of the internal information system, the more managers seem able to tease out real information from just nominal information. That helps them make better investment decisions.

New regulation that helped

To further test the validity of our results, we also looked at the introduction of new regulation in the EU that prompted specific firms to improve their information systems. Enacted in 2006, the 8th EU Company Law Directive required public firms to put in place effective controls to monitor critical risks and to ensure that their board of directors and audit committee received appropriate reports.

In European countries that adopted the directive, public firms subject to the regulation increased the quality of their internal information systems more than private firms did—and more than public firms in countries that didn’t adopt the directive.

Supporting our argument, we found that this increase in the quality of internal information systems mitigated the positive relation between inflation and investment.

Implications

Better internal information systems help managers figure out whether revenue boosts are due to actual consumer demand or mere inflationary pressure. This enables them to make smarter investment decisions.

Why aren’t all managers benefiting from high-quality information systems? One obvious reason is that it’s costly to set up good information systems. Such systems are a function of costs and potential outputs that management wants to achieve in terms of decision-making.

It’s also possible that firms weren’t necessarily able to measure the quality of their internal information system. The questionnaire of the World Management Survey, especially the part about performance monitoring, could help steer a firm in the right direction.

While previous research gives much attention to the relation between the quality of a firm’s external corporate reporting and its investments, our contribution highlights the importance of internal information systems for improved investment decision-making.

First published March 29, 2022, on INSEAD’s Knowledge blog.

Discuss

About The Authors

Oliver Binz’s picture

Oliver Binz

Oliver Binz is an INSEAD assistant professor of accounting and control.

Elia Ferracuti’s picture

Elia Ferracuti

Elia Ferracuti is an assistant professor of accounting at Duke’s Fuqua School of Business.

Peter Joos’s picture

Peter Joos

Peter Joos is an associate professor of accounting and control at INSEAD, the holder of The Barons Janssen Endowed Professorship, and current chair of the Accounting and Control Area at INSEAD.