Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Management Features
Taran March @ Quality Digest
If at first you don’t succeed, make it a quality problem
Richard Ruiz
Seven ways automation can focus layered process audits on quality improvement rather than administrative workload
Ryan E. Day
Dimensional Engineering uses FARO QuantumS ScanArm for a complex reverse engineering project in petrochemical industry
Janelle Farkas
Data and analysis don’t have to be complicated to yield bottom-line benefits
Theodoros Evgeniou
To leverage AI’s transformational potential, remember that people will determine its context

More Features

Management News
Workers more at ease about job security. Millennials more confident regarding wages.
46% of creative workers want video games in the office
A guide for practitioners and managers
Provides eight operating modes and five alarms
April 25, 2019 workshop focused on hoshin kanri and critical leadership skills related to strategy deployment and A3 thinking
Process concerns technology feasibility, commercial potential, and transition to marketplace
Identifying the 252 needs for workforce development to meet our future is a complex, wicked, and urgent problem
How established companies turn the tables on digital disruptors
Streamlines shop floor processes, manages nonconformance life cycle, supports enterprisewide continuous improvement

More News

Martin Abel

Management

Bosses Face More Discrimination if They Are Women—From Employees of Any Gender

People react negatively if something violates their expectations

Published: Wednesday, November 6, 2019 - 12:01

Imagine that your boss Ethan calls you into his office. He expresses disappointment in your recent performance and lack of commitment. How would you react? Accept the feedback and put in more effort? Would you pout in your office and start looking for a new job?

Now, would your reaction be different if your boss was not named Ethan but Emily?

I’m a professor of economics, and my research investigates this very question. We hired 2,700 workers online to transcribe receipts, randomly assigning a male or female name to a manager, and randomly assigning which workers would receive performance feedback.

Results show that both women and men react more negatively to criticism if it comes from a woman. Our subjects reported that criticism by a woman led to a larger reduction in job satisfaction than criticism by a man. Employees were also doubly disinterested in working for the firm in the future if they had been criticized by a female boss.

This has important implications for the success of women in leadership. If using feedback is more likely to backfire for women in positions of power, they may adopt less effective management strategies or become altogether less interested in holding leadership positions.

Women in the workplace

Women make up 45 percent of employees of S&P 500 firms. Yet, they make up only 37 percent of managers at the midlevel, 26 percent at the senior level, and 5 percent of CEOs.

This is true despite women having overtaken men in educational attainment. They have also begun scoring higher on leadership competency tests in recent years.

Existing studies do not find clear evidence of gender discrimination against job applicants for upper management. Due to methodological constraints, such research typically focuses on hiring for entry-level positions.

Why discrimination?

Women in upper management are not simply being ignored. Workers hired for the transcription in our study actually spent slightly more time reading and thinking about feedback from female managers.

Neither can implicit biases explain why employees are less likely to take criticism well from women. Although we found that workers in this study were on average more likely to subconsciously associate men with career and women with family, this tendency does not predict whether they discriminate against female bosses.

Discrimination is also not a lack of exposure to female supervisors. Workers stating that their previous female supervisor was highly effective were just as likely to discriminate.

Instead, what seems to drive the results are gendered expectations of management styles. Other studies have shown that workers are three times more likely to associate giving praise with female managers and twice more likely to associate giving criticism with male managers. People react negatively if something violates their expectations.

Case in point: critical female bosses.

It remains unclear to what extent results from this study generalize to more traditional work settings. Yet, the “gig economy” and other remote work arrangements are a rapidly expanding part of the economy.

Some have argued that these jobs offer more flexibility and thus particularly benefit women. However, findings from this study highlight additional concerns about discrimination in the gig economy due to lack of regulatory oversight and equal opportunity protections in these jobs.

What can be done?

Recently, some firms started trying to stem discrimination against women in management positions.

Several have employed “feedback coaches,” teaching workers to focus on the content of feedback rather than the identity of the person providing it. There is also evidence that informing people of their biases may affect their behavior.

Other research suggests that highlighting specific credentials of women in leadership—such as positive evaluations or reference letters—may be an effective remedy.

To end on a hopeful note: Discrimination against female bosses in my study is lower among younger workers and disappears for those in their 20s. Though younger employees may discriminate more as they age, it could be that this is a generational shift.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Discuss

About The Author

Martin Abel’s picture

Martin Abel

Martin Abel is an assistant professor in economics at Middlebury College and Research Affiliate at the Institute of Labor Economics  (IZA).