Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Management Features
Eric Whitley
Seven tips for efficient maintenance
Zhanna Lyubykh
Consequences and costs of abusive supervision
Dario Lirio
Modernization is critical to enhance patient experience and boost clinical trial productivity
Oliver Binz
Better internal information systems help managers tell consumer demand from inflationary pressure
Dale Crawford
Electrical contractors and other skilled trades are losing institutional knowledge

More Features

Management News
Attendees will learn how three top manufacturing companies use quality data to predict and prevent problems, improve efficiency, and reduce costs
More than 40% of directors surveyed cite the ability of companies to execute as one of the biggest threats to improving ESG performance
MIT Sloan study shows that target-independent compensation systems can be superior
Steps that will help you improve and enhance your employee recruitment, retention, and engagement
300 Talent acquisition leaders and HR executives from companies gather in Kansas City
FedEx demonstrates commitment to customer-focused continuous improvement
SONY-based 8MP color, UVC USB, high-speed camera provides high dynamic range and dual-stream support
Configuration lifecycle management provider saw 42% increase in annual recurring revenue
Designed to offer a comprehensive safety solution for fleet vehicles and workforce personnel

More News

Etienne Nichols


Best Practices for an Effective Medical-Device Design Transfer Process

More than passing a baton

Published: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 - 13:01

If you’re looking for information on medical-device design controls and product development, you can find a practically endless number of articles, videos, and podcasts with a few quick online searches. Yet with so much out there on these topics, there’s a glaring omission of a closely related subject: design transfer.

Not only is design transfer left out of many guides and overviews of the product life cycle, it’s also relegated to just a single sentence in 21 CFR Part 820: “Each manufacturer shall establish and maintain procedures to ensure that the device design is correctly translated into production specifications.”

If that sounds too vague to be of much help, you’re not alone. With so much uncertainty around design transfer, let’s take a closer look at the process, when it should happen, and what it should entail.

What happens during design transfer?

The basic definition of design transfer is the process by which a medical device’s design is transferred to production. However, this is a deceptively simple way of explaining a much more complex and ongoing process.

Design transfer is not a single event; you’re not handing off a baton to the manufacturing team and telling them to run with it. When it’s done correctly, design transfer occurs throughout the entire design process.

Still, as per the FDA’s statement on design transfer, your company must have procedures in place to ensure the transfer is successfully executed. These procedures aren’t just another box to check, either.

The design transfer process includes a number of activities—like demonstrating successful design verification and validation, and ensuring your device master record (DMR) is complete and accurate—that must occur before manufacturing can begin.

Many medical device companies use a design transfer checklist to make sure that all the necessary activities have been completed and documented. A good design transfer checklist also includes all the documents, like the bill of materials, assembly drawings, and finished product specifications, that must be passed on to the manufacturing team.

When should you start the design transfer process?

The short answer is: at the very beginning of the design process.

This may seem like an exaggeration, but it’s critical to the success of your design transfer process that you consider how the design will actually be produced. If your team never takes manufacturing into account, you can easily be saddled with expensive delays and design changes at the exact moment you’d like to be scaling production.

There are a couple common mistakes that keep medical-device companies from starting their process early enough.

Don’t wait until design-validation testing to begin thinking about manufacturing

FDA regulations on design controls clearly state that product validation must be performed “on initial production units, lots, or batches, or their equivalents.”

Companies often wait until they need these initial units to begin thinking about design transfer, but that’s a mistake. For one thing, your units must be built in the production environment, using your design outputs (e.g., drawings and specifications).

You don’t want to delay your validation process because a contract manufacturer tells you there’s a problem with producing the device you’ve designed.

What’s more, even if you produce a few units for testing, that doesn’t necessarily guarantee you’ll be able to manufacture full-scale production volumes the same way.

Don’t assume that the product development team is thinking about design for manufacturing

The biggest mistake medical device companies make in the design-transfer process is assuming that the product development team has manufacturing in mind as they design the device.

Your engineers will be focused on things like how the design outputs meet design inputs, but that doesn’t mean they’re always considering what it will be like to manufacture the product at scale.

The solution to this problem is simply to involve production team leaders or manufacturing engineers early in the design process—not when you’re nearing the finish line.

Looping in manufacturing experts during design controls allows them to assist with the design transfer process from the very beginning. They can provide insight on manufacturing approaches and offer expert insight on the viability of proposed materials or design, ensuring that the design process isn’t siloed from production considerations.

Use design-control software for an airtight design transfer

With so many moving parts involved in a design transfer, all it takes is one slip-up to create costly delays in production. And when you use a paper-based quality management system (QMS) you’re almost certain to miss a signature, forget to update a document, or lose one entirely when you need it the most.

That’s why it’s important to explore design-control software that provides a centralized workspace where everyone can see each other’s updates in real time. Chasing signatures and searching through endless email threads is no way to deal effectively with design transfers. You need everything at your fingertips in a single centralized and easily searchable system, which is the most efficacious way to go.


About The Author

Etienne Nichols’s picture

Etienne Nichols

Etienne Nichols is a medical device guru and mechanical engineer who loves learning and teaching how systems work together. With a Project Management Professional (PMP) certification, Nichols’ experience includes manufacturing and product development aiding in the development of combination drug-delivery devices.