Published: Monday, January 10, 2022 - 13:02 Communities across the U.S. Southeast and Midwest are assessing damage from the deadly and widespread tornado outbreak on Dec. 10–11, 2021. It’s clear that the cleanups will take months and possibly years. Dealing with enormous quantities of debris and waste materials is one of the most significant challenges for communities in the wake of natural disasters. Often this task overwhelms local waste managers, leaving waste untouched for weeks, months, or even years. The most destructive and costliest wildfire in California’s history, the Camp Fire, killed 85 people and destroyed nearly 19,000 structures in November 2018. A year later, crews were still collecting and carrying away piles of wood, metals, appliances, contaminated soil, toxic household chemicals, and other debris and waste totaling more than 3.2 million metric tons—roughly the weight of 2 million cars. Hurricane Michael, which hit Florida in October 2018, left about 13 million cubic meters of debris. To visualize what that looks like, picture a pile of 13 million boxes, each the size of a washer and dryer. More than a year later, crews were still removing the waste. As researchers who study urban engineering, disaster management and planning, and waste management, we see this as a critical and understudied problem. Disasters will continue to happen, and the losses they cause will continue to grow as a result of climate change, population growth, urbanization, deforestation, and aging infrastructures. Societies urgently need better strategies for dealing with the wastes these events leave behind. Climate-related disasters like floods, landslides, storms, wildfires, and extreme hot and cold waves afflict millions of people around the world. These events have been increasing over time, particularly over the past several decades, and so have the losses they cause. In 2020, the United States experienced a record-setting 22 natural disasters that each caused at least a billion dollars in damages. For 2021, the count stood at 18 such events through early October. The mid-December tornado outbreak doubtlessly will add to it. Disasters commonly produce thousands to millions of tons of debris in a single event. For example, waste from hurricanes includes vegetation, such as trees and shrubs; municipal solid waste, such as household garbage; construction and demolition materials; vehicles; and household hazardous materials, including paints, cleaning agents, pesticides, and pool chemicals. Debris from wildfires largely consists of ash, contaminated soils, metal, and concrete, along with other structural debris and household hazardous items such as paints, cleaners, solvents, oils, batteries, herbicides, and pesticides. Debris collection and cleanup following a disaster is a slow, expensive, and dangerous process. First, crews clear out debris from roads used for rescue efforts. They then move the material to temporary storage areas. No one has yet invented a way to easily sort or contain hazardous materials, so they remain mixed into the debris mass. This poses major challenges for reusing and recycling post-disaster waste. Beyond direct health and safety risks, debris also threatens the environment. It can emit air pollutants and contaminate groundwater, surface waters, and soil. Uncollected debris and waste can hamper rescue and recovery efforts, and slow down rebuilding efforts. As an example, when Hurricane Katrina flooded New Orleans in 2005, it left behind an estimated 75 million cubic meters of waste that interfered with and slowed down recovery efforts. The debris included close to 900,000 white goods, such as refrigerators; 350,000 cars; and more than 16,000 metric tons of rotten meat. Cleanup costs were estimated at roughly $4 billion. At an expert workshop that we organized in 2019, we identified steps for sustainably managing disaster debris and waste. As we see it, the key tasks are to 1) identify what is contained in these wastes; 2) find better approaches to recycling and reuse; 3) design new technologies to identify hazardous components and sort the different types of waste; and 4) develop markets to promote reuse and recycling. Today public officials and planners know little about the amount and types of materials generated during disasters—what they contain, in what proportions, whether they are large and sortable vs. fine and mixed, and how much can be reused or recycled. Developing new technologies and management approaches that can assist debris characterization, reuse, and recycling should be a top priority. For example, drones and autonomous sensing technologies can be combined with artificial intelligence to estimate amounts and quality of debris, the types of materials it contains, and how it can be repurposed rapidly. Technologies that allow for fast sorting and separation of mixed materials can also speed up debris management operations. Turning the problem around, creating new, sustainable construction materials—especially in disaster-prone areas—will make it easier to repurpose debris after disasters. Finally, new business models can help generate demand for, and access to, waste and recycled products. With proper sorting, some disaster materials can be used to make new products or materials. For example, downed whole trees can become timber resources for furniture makers. Today, opportunities to match materials with markets are wasted—pun intended. This is an updated version of an article originally published on Dec. 10, 2019. Sybil Derrible is an associate professor of civil, materials, and environmental engineering at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Juyeong Choi is an assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering at Florida State University. Nasli Yesiller is a research schlar and co-director of the Global Waste Research institute at California Polytechnic State University.
Lean Smashed Cars, Burnt Trees, Soggy Insulation
Post-disaster cleanup is expensive, time-consuming, and wasteful
Trails of wreckage
Dangerous and in the way
Toward reusing disaster waste
Article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
About The Authors
Sybil Derrible
Juyeong Choi
Nazli Yesiller
© 2022 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute, Inc.
