Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Lean Features
Chris Caldwell
Significant breakthroughs are required, but fully automated facilities are in the future
Megan Wallin-Kerth
Or, how mistakes factor into a kaizen mindset
Eric Whitley
Manufacturing methods and technologies that improve waste management
Donna McGeorge
Design the day for maximum productivity with this Nano Tool
Scott A. Hindle
Part 2 of our series on SPC in a digital era

More Features

Lean News
Embrace mistakes as valuable opportunities for improvement
Introducing solutions to improve production performance
Helping organizations improve quality and performance
Quality doesn’t have to sacrifice efficiency
Weighing supply and customer satisfaction
Specifically designed for defense and aerospace CNC machining and manufacturing
From excess inventory and nonvalue work to $2 million in cost savings
Tactics aim to improve job quality and retain a high-performing workforce
Sept. 28–29, 2022, at the MassMutual Center in Springfield, MA

More News

Mike Figliuolo



No one needs recurring meetings, unnecessary reports, and thoughtless emails

Published: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 - 11:03

Meetings give me a rash. A really bad one. One that not even calamine lotion can soothe. The only things worse than meetings are reports. Standard daily reports, weekly reports, hourly reports. Reports on the status of reports. If I wasn’t already insane, these things would drive me insane.

Take a look at your Outlook for this week (or if you’re a rebel, look at your Lotus Notes). How much time is spoken for already? How little time is left for you to actually get stuff done? Now take a look at your inbox. How many Excel files are in there with their thousands of rows of data that no one will look at until some SVP gets bored, opens one up, and asks a random question about a data point no one has looked at in months? Even more alarming is if you have folders in your Outlook dedicated to storing each of these reports so you can quickly answer said random questions because you have the reports conveniently stored on your laptop. By the way, they’re probably also stored on a shared drive somewhere, so you’ve now doubled the amount of data storage space required for this crap repository.

Fear not, my friends. There is a cure.

First, let’s look more closely at the symptoms and understand why Outlook meetings and reports spread faster than pink eye at a daycare center. There seems to be this pervasive mindset out there that to be important, you have to be invited to the meeting. Heaven forbid you get left off the Outlook invite. They might even be talking about you! The problem such paranoia creates is people over-invite to prevent others from freaking out from not being on the invite list.

So how do we cure symptom No. 1? Decline the meeting. If you don’t need to be there, don’t go. Really. They won’t miss you. And you won’t miss anything. Be brutally honest with accept/decline decisions, rather than default “accepting” because it seems the right thing to do. And don’t contribute to the problem. If someone doesn’t have to be at your meeting, don’t invite them. Do them a favor and let them get back to work.

The second symptom of Outlookoriasis is those nasty little recurrence circles. You know the ones—the recycle-looking arrow on a meeting that means you’re going to be bored to tears the second Tuesday of every month with no “end after 10 recurrences” in sight. It’s a trap. Once a meeting is set to be recurring, it’s harder to kill than the Terminator. It becomes part of everyone’s routine. The worst ones are staff meetings (click here to hear me opine on that fine forum full of frivolous frolicking).

I once became responsible for a monthly task force that was focused on reducing our loss rates. I was the new guy. I didn’t know any better and accepted the honor of running the meeting. After my first one, it was clear the meeting had outlived its usefulness. It simply needed someone to tell it it was dead. Its recurrence was something out of Monty Python: “I’m not dead yet!” “Oh, you soon will be!”

It became my purpose in life to slay that beast. I looked for ways to automate or eliminate the reporting we did. We began managing the meeting by exception (rather than recapping every idea on the list and saying, “Nothing new since last month” after each one). Over time the meetings got shorter. No one complained. It finally got to a point that I shot out the email notifying everyone I’d be canceling the meeting going forward unless someone objected. There were no replies. Taps sounded.

Another time I walked into a meeting called by my project manager. I was the sponsor. We were deciding whether to go live with a new web product. The meeting was called to discuss some issues we’d come across during testing. The update I received before the one-hour meeting was that the issue we’d found would cause huge issues for our customers if we went live as planned. As the PM started the meeting, I asked, “So why are we here?”

“To determine whether we should go live or not based on the issue we found.”

“From what I can tell, it’s a show stopper, no?”

“Yes. For the most part.”

“Then why are we having this meeting?”

“So everyone can talk about why we have this show stopper, and we can get consensus on postponing the go live.”

Yes. It was surreal.

“How about this. No go live. Decision made. You now have 58 minutes back to go figure out what the problem is so we can go live later.” Meeting ended. Purpose met.

Just because Outlook says it’s an hour doesn’t mean it has to be an hour. End the meeting when the purpose has been met. More work gets done that way.

Now that we’ve covered three ways to reduce Outlookoriasis (decline meetings, kill irrelevant ones—especially recurring ones—and end when the purpose has been met rather than when Outlook says you’re supposed to end), let’s look at the chronic case of reportarrhea many organizations suffer from.

Our world is increasingly fact-based and data-driven. That’s a good thing. Unfortunately, someone always has to take things too far. Suddenly they produce an analysis that shows how denim prices in New Jersey are inversely correlated with the sum of the squares of the inverse slope of hairspray sales in Guatemala. Some senior person finds this analysis brilliant and decides to add value. They say something inane like, “We should track how that relationship trends on an hourly basis!” And a report is born—or excreted is more like it.

Sure, reports have purpose. People will defend them vigorously with cries of, “You can’t manage what you can’t measure.” I agree. Unfortunately, the appropriate retort is rarely used: “So what exactly are we trying to manage here by using this report?” That one usually generates blank stares.

Want to kill reports? Do so with reckless abandon. Ask everyone which reports are the least used, the hardest to create, or the most meaningless from a management standpoint. Then stop producing them for a week. Betcha $50 nobody notices. If they do, the report might have value. At least go ask the question before you blindly start producing it going forward. Demand that every report have a clear customer, a clear action or set of actions it drives, and a defined end point or review of its existence. Sometimes reports die a natural death because you’ve made the progress you needed to and you no longer need to manage the metric. Having a semiannual review of whether a report lives or dies is a good practice.

Reportarrhea is curable. It takes clear definition of a report’s purpose and a regular review not only of what report you’re producing but also why you’re producing it. Your analysis teams and operators will be thrilled to reduce the amount of reporting—it’s a burden. Minimize it to a level of bare essentials and your organization will function more smoothly (plus you’ll save a few bucks on data storage).

Published Aug. 16, 2023, in thoughtLEADERS Brief on LinkedIn.


About The Author

Mike Figliuolo’s picture

Mike Figliuolo

Mike Figliuolo is the author of The Elegant Pitch (Weiser, 2016) and One Piece of Paper (Jossey-Bass, 2011), and co-author of Lead Inside the Box (Weiser, 2015). He’s also the managing director of thoughtLEADERS LLC, a leadership development training firm. He regularly writes about leadership on the thoughtLEADERS Blog.



I like this article that reflects lot of nowadays real situation...at least we could say ...we aren't politicians but the quality people...facts...evidences...and good level data to be analyzed