That’s fake news. Real news COSTS. Please turn off your ad blocker for our web site.
Our PROMISE: Our ads will never cover up content.
Michael Causey
Published: Monday, August 3, 2015 - 11:26 Although medical-industry trade groups and many House and Senate members are lined up on one side, determined to repeal the medical device tax, the other side might have the final ace: A veto threat by President Obama.
Not so fast, say opponents who want to eliminate the 2.3-percent excise tax on medical devices, which the Affordable Care Act has mandated. Opponents believe they have enough votes from Democrats to override any veto. Already in the House of Representatives, a June vote fell just one shy of the 281 needed to brush back any Obama veto. It’s worth noting that 12 Republicans were absent on the day of that vote. Most, if not all, would certainly support killing the device tax. The House, at least on an initial vote, appears to be a lock for those who want the tax gone. It’s a little trickier in the Senate, where several Democrats have joined Republicans to remove the tax from the Affordable Care Act, commonly referred to as Obamacare. The Supreme Court’s recent decision that essentially upheld the Act could give political cover to wavering Democrats to stick with Obama and preserve the tax. Another factor: Dems against the tax might vote against it the first time, but then back off from overriding a veto and doing political damage to Obama. With the presidential primary season already lurking in the background, Dems could be reluctant to weaken the president’s “value” when it comes to campaigning for Dems in key Senate and House races—not to mention supporting Hillary Clinton or whoever ends up grabbing the democratic presidential nomination. In the days before air conditioning, Washington was something of a ghost town in July and August. Business on Capitol Hill essentially ground to a halt. Today, life on the Hill does slow during those months, but deals are still cut, and compromises worked out. The smart money is on some kind of showdown next month. But remember: This is Washington D.C. Sure, today’s lawmakers can crank up the a/c and remain more active than their predecessors 60 years ago, but that doesn’t make them more predictable. D.C. is a weird place in any weather. Watch this space. First published July 23, 2015, on the AssurX blog. Quality Digest does not charge readers for its content. We believe that industry news is important for you to do your job, and Quality Digest supports businesses of all types. However, someone has to pay for this content. And that’s where advertising comes in. Most people consider ads a nuisance, but they do serve a useful function besides allowing media companies to stay afloat. They keep you aware of new products and services relevant to your industry. All ads in Quality Digest apply directly to products and services that most of our readers need. You won’t see automobile or health supplement ads. So please consider turning off your ad blocker for our site. Thanks, James Michael Causey’s been a journalist since he started his own neighborhood newspaper in the 1970s. In addition to quizzing FDA officials for the past 10+ years, he’s also interviewed political satirist Art Buchwald, FCC Chairman Reed Hundt, SEC Chairwoman Mary Schapiro, and is the past president of the Washington Independent Writers. Causey is the editor and publisher of eDataIntegrityReport.com and is a contributing writer on the AssurXblog.Obama Veto Showdown Looms Over Medical Device Tax Battle
But even in summer, deals can be cut on Capitol Hill
Our PROMISE: Quality Digest only displays static ads that never overlay or cover up content. They never get in your way. They are there for you to read, or not.
Quality Digest Discuss
About The Author
Michael Causey
© 2023 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute, Inc.