Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Health Care Features
Merilee Kern
A well-established technology takes on a new threat
Tinglong Dai
It will take several years for the industry to recover. Time enough to rethink organ distribution.
Jeb Banner
Optimize your agenda and ensure your board’s productivity remotely.
Donald J. Wheeler
The United States is ranking first and last in all the wrong places
Gleb Tsipursky
We can’t afford to lose talented quality leaders by failing to pay attention to mental well-being

More Features

Health Care News
Provides improved thermal stability for stored materials, risk mitigation advantages, and processes that are documented and repeatable
Patient safety is a key focus in update of ISO 14155, the industry reference for good practice in clinical trials.
Despite being far from campus because of the pandemic, some students are engineering a creative way to stay connected
Good quality is adding an average of 11 percent to organizations’ revenue growth
Further enhances change management capabilities
Stereotactic robot helps identify target and deliver electrodes to target with submillimetric accuracy
How the nation’s leading multistate cannabis company ensures quality and safety standards
ISO and WHO are working for universal access to quality health products that are all at once safe, effective, and affordable
Certification bodies can conduct food safety audits and issue certifications of foreign food facilities

More News

Health Care

How the Airline Industry Recovers From Covid-19 Could Determine Who Gets Organ Transplants

It will take several years for the industry to recover. Time enough to rethink organ distribution.

Published: Monday, October 12, 2020 - 12:02

The Covid-19 pandemic has crippled the airline industry. Passenger numbers are down more than two-thirds from last year, and airlines have been canceling flights and shutting down routes.

It’s frustrating for travelers, but for patients on organ transplant waiting lists, the loss of flights can put a life-saving kidney or heart out of reach.

Our research shows just how valuable each flight route can be for connecting donor organs with people in need of transplants. It also suggests that the industry’s great rebooting in the coming years can be an opportunity to help make the U.S. organ transplantation system more equitable.

As business scholars specializing in the fields of healthcare operations management, business analytics, and economics of information, we believe policymakers need to understand the potential impacts of the airline network on organ transplantation as they guide the post-pandemic recovery of the airline industry.

How the industry recovered during the years following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks offers important cues.

Racing the clock

Nearly 40,000 transplants were performed in 2019, and yet more than 100,000 patients are on the waiting list for transplants. Each day, 18 people die while waiting for a donor organ.

Organ transplantation is a time-sensitive operation. The time between when an organ is harvested and when it is transplanted, known as “cold ischemia time,” has a significant impact on whether the transplanted kidney will be a success or lose its function. For a kidney from a deceased donor, the maximum allowable time is between 24 and 36 hours.

Whenever a kidney from a deceased donor becomes available, it is offered first to local transplant centers that are closest, followed by other centers in the same region, and finally centers around the country. Every year, about 1,400 kidneys are shipped across regions, typically by commercial flights, and they are racing the clock.


Donor kidneys are viable for transplant for only a short time.

Each flight connection poses a potential danger of missing the time window, as several transplantation professionals described in a recent public forum. In some cases, life-saving organs have gotten lost during flight connections.

Because of those risks, transplant centers may have a strong preference for direct flights when deciding whether to accept a kidney from a remote location. Regions with fewer airline connections are clearly disadvantaged. For example, regular flights make it easier for hospitals near Chicago to share donor organs with those in the Denver region than with other, geographically closer locations, as John Friedewald of Northwestern University explained.

One recent analysis found that during the Covid-19 pandemic, normally direct flights used for carrying donor organs long distances have been down 65 percent, and some median wait time between flights increased from 1.5 hours to nearly 5 hours.

Learning from the post-9/11 airline recovery

The September 11 attacks also led to severe disruptions to the U.S. airline industry. By some estimates, the demand for air travel decreased by more than 30 percent following the attacks. It then took nearly four years for capacity to return to the pre-9/11 level. Such a slow recovery offers a unique window into the effect of airline transportation on organ transplantation.

Using data from the U.S. Department of Transportation, we tracked all the airline routes between 2002 and 2017, focusing on airport pairs at least 800 miles apart. Between 2002 and 2005, we observed 18 new airline routes that connected airports previously not served by any direct flight. Then, between 2006 and 2017, another 41 new airline routes were added.

During our study period, 28,822 kidneys were shared across geographic regions, according to the United Network for Organ Sharing.

We found that each new airline route led to an increase of about 7.3 percent in the number of kidneys that are sent to transplant centers across regions in the United States.

We found that an increase in the number of kidneys sent between pairs of airports did not decrease the number of kidneys sent elsewhere, and that the overall quality of kidneys did not decline. Our research showed that it often takes two to three years for new airline routes to reflect on organ transplantation numbers.

Lessening the inequality in organ sharing

The waiting time for a kidney transplant depends heavily on where the recipient lives. The median waiting time before the pandemic ranged from about four months in Arkansas to more than three years in parts of Northern California.

One primary driver of the inequity is that most organs are matched locally, and different regions have different supply-and-demand characteristics.

Numerous policies have been proposed for expanding the sharing of organs across regions, but most focus on changing how organs are allocated. To make the organ transplantation system more equitable, policymakers also need to pay attention to the role of airline transportation.

The airline industry will experience a slow recovery after the Covid-19 pandemic, and several major airlines are expected to receive billions of dollars in financial assistance from the federal government.

Our research suggests that as policymakers give taxpayer money to airline companies and guide the recovery of this industry, they have a unique opportunity to shape the U.S. airline networks and, in turn, make the U.S. organ transplantation system more equitable.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Discuss

About The Authors

Tinglong Dai’s picture

Tinglong Dai

Tinglong Dai is an associate professor of operations management and business analytics at Johns Hopkins Carey Business School, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing.

Guihua Wang’s picture

Guihua Wang

Guihua Wang is an assistant professor in the Naveen Jindal School of Management at the University of Texas in Dallas.

Ronghuo Zheng’s picture

Ronghuo Zheng

Ronghuo Zheng is an assistant professor of accounting at McCombs School of Business at the University of Texas.