Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Customer Care Features
Leah Chan Grinvald
Independent repair shops are fighting for access to vehicles’ increasingly sophisticated data
Gad Allon
Aligning timing, leadership, and strategy is complicated
Delivering quality to the health industry
Mike Figliuolo
Globalization is an unstoppable trend, so why not take advantage of it?

More Features

Customer Care News
A tool to help detect sinister email
Developing tools to measure and improve trustworthiness
Manufacturers embrace quality management to improve operations, minimize risk
Scaling operations to reduce plastic waste in oceans
Survey shows 85% of top performers rely on it to achieve business objectives
Educational offerings available in Santa Clara in December 2023
Precision cutting tools maker gains visibility and process management across product life cycles
A Heart for Science initiative brings STEM to young people

More News

Shobhendu Prabhakar

Customer Care

The Higher the Quality, the Lower the Cost

Contrary to conventional wisdom, increased quality doesn’t always equate to increased cost

Published: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 - 11:03

Historically, conventional wisdom among business managers was that the higher the quality, the higher the cost. This perception still holds true today among a few business managers. Common sense also tells us the same thing, i.e., to create higher quality products or services, organizations will have to spend more. However, is this perception the reality, and does common sense make sense in this scenario?

Here are five compelling arguments why higher quality means lower cost.

1. Zero is supposed to be nothing, but it means a lot when it comes to the defects. We can all agree that even one defect equates to additional cost, time, and effort. But can’t similar, related products in your product line suffer the same or similar defects? This means that to get the true cost of that defect you must multiply the additional correction cost, time, and effort with the number of products with the same or similar defects. Still not clear? Think about recalls where numerous products are victims of the same defect, and the company incurs hefty costs in recalling an entire range of products. However, if there is no defect, correction costs come out of the equation. Therefore, zero is a very significant number in the context of defects.

2. One is the smallest positive integer. What? Well, getting things done right the first time costs the least. If things are not done right the first time, be prepared to do rework. Does rework cost? Of course. How much? It depends and can vary from hundreds to thousands to millions of dollars. Doing things right the first time is better than rework. So, which option costs less? By now, you should know the answer.

3. Our greatest foes, who we must chiefly combat, are within. This is not only true about humans but also holds good when it comes to poor quality of product and services, and inefficiencies of processes or systems. It can be argued that appraisal activities such as audits, verifications, and inspections in the quality world are analogous to introspection in the human world. To keep ourselves in check and to improve, introspection is a must. Similarly, appraisal activities are a must to ensure superior quality and to avoid internal and external failures. Do appraisal activities cost? Obviously! But, better questions to ask are:
Do appraisal activities ensure higher quality products? Surely, they do.
Are appraisal costs higher than the cost of internal and external failures? Perhaps not.

4. An ounce of prevention is worth more than a million pounds of correction. If you don’t believe this, here is an example. A company is installing an offshore structure, and a lift can’t be performed because the crane broke. They dig into why and find that the last preventive maintenance run was somehow missed. Now, not only do they incur the cost of crane repair but also the cost of a vessel on standby, which can cost $60,000 to $300,000 per day, plus the pain of customer dissatisfaction. Depending on the extent of the crane failure issue, the repair may take a few hours, to a day, to multiple days, during which a vessel is on standby. If you compare the cost of crane repair (plus the vessel standby plus the intangible costs of customer dissatisfaction) with the costs of preventive maintenance, you will find that the ratio is somewhere close to 1,000,000:1 and sometimes even more. And let’s not forgot about the stress, chaos, and pressure that came with it.

Additionally, but more important, crane failures and malfunctioning during lifting operations can result in safety incidents with severity from near misses and minor injuries to fatalities. According to The New York Times, lifting incidents represent the second most significant cause of fatalities on the Outer Continental Shelf, defined as all submerged lands lying seaward of state coastal waters (3 miles offshore) that are under U.S. jurisdiction. In the case of a fatality, no money (not a million or even a billion) can replace the life that is lost. Therefore, prevention matters, and it is worth more than a million pounds of correction.

5. Butterfly effect. The butterfly effect is a term often used to emphasize the outsize significance of minor occurrences. Minor occurrences of poorly designed processes or systems can have significant negative impacts on the performance of products and services. Similarly, small occurrences of process or system infractions can lead to an inferior quality culture within the organization. Inferior quality culture and poor processes can create a negative butterfly effect and generate more waste, higher recalls, greater rework, and more defective products—which eventually increase the organization’s operational costs, decreases profits, shrinks market share, and reduces the level of customer satisfaction. On the other hand, a mature quality culture and superior processes and systems have a positive butterfly effect on operational efficiency, reducing waste, minimizing rework, abating recalls, and producing defect-free products—which ultimately reduce the organization’s overall costs, increase profits, grow market share, and improve the level of customer satisfaction.

I hope these arguments are convincing enough to help you think differently about the relationship between cost and quality. The lower the quality, the higher the cost. The higher the quality, the lower the cost.


About The Author

Shobhendu Prabhakar’s picture

Shobhendu Prabhakar

Shobhendu Prabhakar is working with TechnipFMC in a project quality manager role. He holds a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering, a master’s degree in mechanical design engineering, and a master’s degree in business administration. He is a Jones Scholar (Rice University in Houston) and a certified ISO 9001 lead auditor with 14+ years of professional experience in quality assurance in oil and gas industries. This article does not represent any TechnipFMC position, and it is in no way related to TechnipFMC.


Very Nice article with

Very Nice article with examples. Very well written. Thumps Up